Photo 30 Apr 301 notes theatlantic:

You Don’t Own Anything Anymore

Google’s terms of service sound grabby because they are: the terms of service for Google Drive (and pretty much every Google service) give Google the right to do almost anything with your uploaded content. This isn’t because Google has a bunch of really cool ideas for “publicly performing” your photos. It’s because copyright law was written before there was a such thing as computers.
“Copyright law itself is really strange,” says Greg Lastowka, co-director of the Rutgers Institute for Information Policy & Law. These companies, he says, are only doing “what copyright law forces them to do.”
Say you draw a picture. You literally own the paper and the ink that you used to draw it, but the thing you have a copyright for is intangible: it’s the pattern, the shapes, the design. If someone comes along a steals your drawing, they’re stealing your property. If someone takes a photo of your drawing, they’re violating your copyright. “When you say you own a photo,” says Lastowka, “you really mean ‘I have the exclusive right to reproduce my photo.’”
In a world where sharing a photo is strictly a matter of getting another copy made and mailing it, or getting it published, copyrights are pretty easy to keep track of and these laws hold up pretty well. Sending a physical photo to your grandmother goes like this: you either put the picture in an envelope and send it, or you get a copy made yourself and send that.
Sending your grandmother an email photo, though, might involve copying your photo five or six times; first to Google’s servers, then to another server, then to an ISP’s CDN, then to AOL’s servers, then to your grandmother’s computer. As far as you’re concerned, this feels exactly like dropping an envelope in the mail. As far as copyright is concerned, it’s a choreographed legal dance.
Read more.

This is smart. (via Buzzfeed)

theatlantic:

You Don’t Own Anything Anymore

Google’s terms of service sound grabby because they are: the terms of service for Google Drive (and pretty much every Google service) give Google the right to do almost anything with your uploaded content. This isn’t because Google has a bunch of really cool ideas for “publicly performing” your photos. It’s because copyright law was written before there was a such thing as computers.

“Copyright law itself is really strange,” says Greg Lastowka, co-director of the Rutgers Institute for Information Policy & Law. These companies, he says, are only doing “what copyright law forces them to do.”

Say you draw a picture. You literally own the paper and the ink that you used to draw it, but the thing you have a copyright for is intangible: it’s the pattern, the shapes, the design. If someone comes along a steals your drawing, they’re stealing your property. If someone takes a photo of your drawing, they’re violating your copyright. “When you say you own a photo,” says Lastowka, “you really mean ‘I have the exclusive right to reproduce my photo.’”

In a world where sharing a photo is strictly a matter of getting another copy made and mailing it, or getting it published, copyrights are pretty easy to keep track of and these laws hold up pretty well. Sending a physical photo to your grandmother goes like this: you either put the picture in an envelope and send it, or you get a copy made yourself and send that.

Sending your grandmother an email photo, though, might involve copying your photo five or six times; first to Google’s servers, then to another server, then to an ISP’s CDN, then to AOL’s servers, then to your grandmother’s computer. As far as you’re concerned, this feels exactly like dropping an envelope in the mail. As far as copyright is concerned, it’s a choreographed legal dance.

Read more.

This is smart. (via Buzzfeed)

  1. vallabenyapmadim reblogged this from photographsonthebrain
  2. bo-rude reblogged this from petapeta
  3. spotyif reblogged this from brtnz
  4. deserttrumpet reblogged this from gjmueller
  5. albertosesn reblogged this from theatlantic
  6. knightworg reblogged this from theatlantic
  7. gotpirates2 reblogged this from theatlantic
  8. byappointmentonly reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. watchingcbeams reblogged this from theatlantic
  10. rockinairman reblogged this from badwolfcomplex
  11. badwolfcomplex reblogged this from the-adventures-in-computing and added:
    “And so we find the disconnect. Do you really own something if another person, or another company, can do whatever they...
  12. bittersweetsamba reblogged this from zenigata
  13. wex reblogged this from theatlantic
  14. chaoticneutral96 reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. saekismsc reblogged this from rio-t
  16. thatssoaustin reblogged this from thecacklingcactus and added:
    Sad reality.
  17. thecacklingcactus reblogged this from reneeejp
  18. naotenhoiphone reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    The internet
  19. edonran reblogged this from theatlantic
  20. yoyoyonoyo reblogged this from zenigata
  21. turntablefuneral reblogged this from theatlantic
  22. fake-dolphin reblogged this from zenigata
  23. the-adventures-in-computing reblogged this from theatlantic
  24. miffycore reblogged this from zenigata
  25. elvenorcishgrrrl reblogged this from digitalhikari
  26. oomp reblogged this from digitalhikari
  27. digitalhikari reblogged this from onaniena

Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.